In The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy—East Asia and Pacific Regional Edition, the World Bank and the Institute for Health Metrics and Examination summarize differences in diseases, injuries, and risk factors for the East Asia and Pacific region and summarizes intraregional differences in diseases, injuries, and risk factors. Unsurprisingly, some countries do a better job than others.
“Between Integration and Coexistence: US-Chinese Strategies of International Order“
Strategic Studies Quarterly
The past five years have witnessed much debate as to whether a world order dominated by liberal internationalists institutions (UN, WTA, World Bank, IMF, etc) has reached the end of its era, and whether perhaps the time has arrived for the rise of a new international order that finds its inspiration in China. The rise of the Chinese economy, the nation’s growing assertiveness in international affairs, and its readiness to interpret international agreements to suit its own purposes makes that question real. Is China happy to run rampant across an established world order, or does it sincerely propose to offer a unique international order of its own?
In an article in the just-released edition of Strategic Studies Quarterly, Danish security strategist Dr. Liselotte Odgaard notes that China and America have espoused two visions of the way the world should work, but she suggests that they are incompatible. Why? Because both are based on domestic ideologies that appear to prevent either side coming to a practical accommodation. The real challenge is whether either of these approaches will garner international support. Odgaard takes a bold step by suggesting which side she thinks will prevail and why.
- Beijing’s Renewed Resolve: Treading The Path Of Peaceful Development – Analysis (eurasiareview.com)
- The Arc of Chinese Strategy (thediplomat.com)
- One Of China’s Top Bankers Says Beijing Is Ready For The ‘Currency War’ To Begin (businessinsider.com)
“The End of ‘Growth with Equity’? Economic Growth and Income Inequality in East Asia”
Honolulu East West Center
In a concise paper, Wang Feng makes an argument for government intervention in China to stem the growing economic inequality in the country.
For those who are uncomfortable with the idea of government intervention, Wang argues that the government (especially in China) can create the conditions for growing inequality. Wang’s implication is plain: the Chinese government has, knowingly or otherwise, fostered the circumstances that have allowed for unsustainable inequality to build. Government action is essential to address the root causes of that inequality.
Wang pulls no punches when it comes to naming culprits. Unless state-owned monopolies are broken up and the concentration of economic power in the hands of the state brought to an end, inequality will continue to grow and instability will result.
This paper is superb read that is refreshingly bereft of technical economic language, makes a clear case for an even more extreme course of reform than the World Bank’s China 2030 made five months ago.
- How Much Inequality? (economistsview.typepad.com)
- People’s experience of growing inequality: a closer look at the “middle” (inequalitiesblog.wordpress.com)
- Malcolm Gladwell on the Situation of Equality Discourse (thesituationist.wordpress.com)
- ‘Inequality and Redistribution during the Great Recession’ (economistsview.typepad.com)
- Income Inequality, Racism and Imprisonment (my.firedoglake.com)